Electric — Raw extract

Bayview Power — raw feed (synthetic)

Guided tour Sample data · no sign-up

Aggregation Weather normalization M&V savings Benchmarking (EUI) Load & demand Seasonal & outdoor use Distribution & inequality Energy burden Map & clustering Class × time Differential privacy Data quality

Disclosure control Suppression k = 15 1 customer ≤ 15% complementary on Methods & formulas

Baseline vs. reporting Baseline model fit on 7 months before Aug 2023; savings measured over the 7 reporting months after it. Temp: 100.0% derived · Modeled climate normal (seasonal + latitude). Production upgrade: NOAA GHCN-Daily nearest-station. Degree days base 65°F (EIA/NOAA).

This is synthetic demo data with no efficiency intervention, so avoided energy should read near 0% — that's the method working correctly. On real post-retrofit data, this is where a program's verified savings appear.

Avoided energy

-14.8%

-11107 kWh / meter

Adjusted baseline (CBL)

75274

kWh / meter expected

Reporting actual

86381

kWh / meter metered

Baseline fit (R²)

0.952

degree-day model

Reporting period: actual vs. adjusted baseline

kWh / meter · month

Bars are metered use; the line is the weather-adjusted baseline (CBL). The gap between them, summed over the reporting period, is the avoided energy.

The baseline model

E = 11152 + -4.6126·HDD + 11.1203·CDD

Heating slope: -4.6126 / HDD
Cooling slope: 11.1203 / CDD
Avoided: -11107 kWh/meter (-14.8%)

Method: IPMVP Option C (EVO 10000-1:2016); weather-adjusted baseline per ASHRAE Guideline 14; base-65°F degree days (US EIA / NOAA).