Guided tour
Sample data · no sign-up
Baseline vs. reporting
Baseline model fit on 5 months
before Jul 2023; savings measured over the
6 reporting months after it.
This is synthetic demo data with no efficiency intervention, so
avoided energy should read near 0% — that's the method working
correctly. On real post-retrofit data, this is where a program's verified savings appear.
Avoided energy
13.2%
1377 therms / meter
Adjusted baseline (CBL)
10399
therms / meter expected
Reporting actual
9022
therms / meter metered
Baseline fit (R²)
0.613
degree-day model
Reporting period: actual vs. adjusted baseline
therms / meter · monthBars are metered use; the line is the weather-adjusted baseline (CBL). The gap between them, summed over the reporting period, is the avoided energy.
The baseline model
E = 3250 + 0.9114·HDD + -4.754·CDD
- Heating slope: 0.9114 / HDD
- Cooling slope: -4.754 / CDD
- Avoided: 1377 therms/meter (13.2%)
Method: IPMVP Option C (EVO 10000-1:2016);
weather-adjusted baseline per ASHRAE Guideline 14; base-65°F degree days (US EIA / NOAA).